tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57726894266049739.post3610356538723870745..comments2024-03-28T11:37:38.689-07:00Comments on Chess Skills: Latent PatternsJames Stripeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13437334325501974461noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57726894266049739.post-68719059853589611482008-10-31T10:42:00.000-07:002008-10-31T10:42:00.000-07:00Thanks for making that point.I mostly agree with y...Thanks for making that point.<BR/><BR/>I mostly agree with you, but still believe that patterns are the key, as long as the patterns are understood in terms of their dynamic aspects. I've added a "postscript" clarifying my argument.James Stripeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13437334325501974461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57726894266049739.post-27104564614817608092008-10-30T14:09:00.000-07:002008-10-30T14:09:00.000-07:00I think it's not the patern(s) that we must recogn...I think it's not the patern(s) that we must recognize but the way we hold it a draw (or win)because knowing a patern is good but if we dont know how to continue we have nothing about all those recognizing paterns.From the patzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04499383398575774704noreply@blogger.com