05 September 2026

Rook vs. Two Minor Pieces

An unexpected win this morning motivated some study of rook and pawns vs. knight, bishop, and pawns. Errors characterized the game, but the ending interests me.

I was slightly better early in the middle game when I blundered into a slightly worse position, and then blundered again into a lost position, but I played on. My opponent blundered away the win to reach an ending that had strong drawing chances despite a dynamic imbalance. He missed an idea that gave him a slight advantage at one point, and then dropped a piece to give me a winning advantage.

White to move
33.Rxh7+??

Had White played 33.Rxb7, I might have decided that it was time to respect my opponent's superior position (as well as a rating 300 higher than mine) and gracefully resign.

33...Qxh7 34.Rxh7+ Kxh7

The position is equal. ChessBase's "Report" feature is useful for studying this sort of ending. A quick glance through the nearly 300 games that are found in MegaDatabase seem to indicate that the minor pieces prevail more often than the rook. Searching my personal database for this material turns up three previous games and I'm always the side with the rook. I have a win, draw, and loss in the three games.

Later in the game, after a pair of pawns are exchanged, the same search mechanism turns up 22 games, most of which were decided by such tactical errors as the rook and king walking into a fork by the bishop or the knight.

We continued.

35.h4 Kg6 36.hxg5 fxg5

White to move
With mobile pawns and each side having a majority, anything is possible. The rook's greater mobility seems promising, but White also could develop an advantage to play for a win. More than likely, good play on both sides should lead to a draw.

37.Ne5 Kf5 38.Nf7 Re7 39.Nd6+ Kg6 40.Nc8

A fork!

Black to move
40...Rh7+ 41.Kg1 a6

Both pieces escape.

42.Nd6 Rd7 43.Kf1 Kf6?!

43...Rc7 44.Ke2 Rc3 45.Nxb7 Rxa3=

The position is easier to draw, but Black was oblivious to the dangers.

44.Ke2 Ke6 45Ne4 Kf5 46.Nd6+ Ke6 47.Ne4 Kf5

Black is anticipating a repetition.

White to move
48.Ke3!?

Activating the king is the right idea, but there is a better way.

48.Nc5! Rh7 49.Kd3 and we see that White intends to dispose of Black's pawn majority. White missed an opportunity to gain a clear advantage. Even so, White is better.

48...Re7 49.f3 g4 50.Bh4

50.Kd4 was the right idea.

50...Re6 51.Bg3 gxf3 52.gxf3 Rb6

Black activates his rook for counterplay.

White to move
53.Nd6+ Kg6?

53...Ke6 was needed.

54.Nc4?

54.Ke4 and White again has a clear advantage. In this case, the f-pawn will work its way up the board with the help of the two minor pieces and the king until Black is forced to give up the rook.

54...Rb3+ 55.Ke4 b5 56.Ne5+ Kg7

White to move
57.f4??

Inexplicable.

Play might have continued 57.Nc6 Rxa3 58.Bd6 Ra2 59.Nd4 and neither Black pawn can advance.

57...Rxg3-+ 58.Nd3 Kf7 59.f5 Rg4+ 60.Ke5 Ra4 61.Kd5 Rxa3 62.Ne5= Kf6 63.Nc6 Kf6 63.Nc6 Kxf5 64.Kc5 Rc3+ 65.Kb6 Rxc6 and White resigned.

After the game, I spent some time looking through endgame books to see who had written about this material imbalance. Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual has four pages.

This position from Beliavsky,A. -- Dolmatov,S., Minsk 1979 shows a creative idea worth remembering.

Black to move
38...c4!! 39.Bxc4 Rc8 40.Bd3 a3! and the game continued another 16 moves. Both the game and Dvorersky's analysis are worthy of study.





15 July 2026

Groping in the Dark

At what level of play can someone be considered good at chess?

During his lecture at the Spokane Chess Club last on the eve of the Inland Classic, IM John Donaldson was discussing Bobby Fischer's remarkable rise after 1955. Donaldson has written several excellent books on Fischer, most recently Inside the Mind of Bobby Fischer: Revisiting His Writings and Annotations (2025). Fischer's rating in 1955 was mid-1700s. Donaldson mentioned some recent analysis of games from Fischer's first rated event that led to that rating and quipped, "he was not very good". 

In contrast to this critical historical assessment of the early career on one of the greatest chess players ever are innumerable threads in social media asking, for example, whether 1100 is a good rating. Most comments in such threads--this one has more than 350--note that 1100 is well above the average on the site. Similarly, a player near the bottom of the standings in the tournament that we played in this past weekend with a USCF rating in the 900s is at the 59th percentile. That player scored a 500+ point upset in the first round, then lost the rest of his games. These players are offered comfort in the knowledge that they are better than half of all rated players, and substantially better than the majority of casual chess enthusiasts who never enter competition.

My rating just above 1860 puts me at the 94th percentile. I told Donaldson on Sunday morning that his comment about Fischer was helping me come to terms with the fact that I'm not very good and never will be. John did not say much about this remark, but we had several conversations throughout the weekend, including him soliciting my insights into finding historic chess games online and a brief discussion of the writing of John Steinbeck, whose published books I am working my way through.

My perspective is grounded in comments I made last spring about the defects in the play of A-class players (see "Two Donner Quotes") and my sense in round two on Saturday that I was unable to comprehend and correctly assess the positions through much of the game. I believed that I was slightly worse early on, but had provoked some pawn structure weaknesses that were exploitable in the ending. When my B-class opponent blundered, I immediately recognized that my winning chances had become very good. In the brief post-game discussion, he immediately mentioned that terrible move that turned a roughly equal position into one where he was clearly worse.

From the point of view of the elementary students whom I coach, and that of the average USCF player, those of us in A-class are strong. Compared to masters and above, we are quite weak. Maybe we have some knowledge, but we also fall prey to bad habits, misevaluate positions through appalling ignorance, and fail to calculate with any precision.

Stripes,James (1865) -- Lopez,Francisco (1614) [A49]
Inland Classic Spokane Valley (2), 21.02.2026

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nbd2

Black to move

This move does not seem to me particularly strong, but I've been playing it in similar positions online the past few months. My idea is to maintain the flexibility to play e4 or c4, depending on how my opponent responds. Of course, blocking the mobility of the dark-squared bishop should be seen as a loss of tempi. 

I had the Black side of this position in round four, when my opponent played 5.c4 instead of my 5.Nbd2. That game continued 5...0-0 6.0-0 Nbd7 7.Nc3 c5 I was already feeling a bit lost in terms of my understanding of how Black should proceed here. 8...e5 is more common and scores much better.

5...Nc6 6.c3 0-0 7.0-0 e5 8.dxe5 Nxe5

8...dxe5 9.e4 a5 10.Qc2 Be6 11.Rd1 Qc8 0-1 Stavrianakis,I (2316) -- Stojanovic,D (2488) Belgrade Trophy 26th 2012

9.Nxe5 dxe5 10.Qb3 c6 11.Rd1 Qc7

White to move

Black's pieces are more mobile.

12.a4

12.Ne4 Nxe4 13.Bxe4 Be6 14.Qb4 Rfd8 15.Be3 Rxd1+ 16.Rxd1 Bf8 17.Qa4 a6 18.Qc2 Rd8 19.Rxd8 Qxd8 20.b4 f5 21.Bg2 Qd7 22.a4 ½-½ Lupinski,I -- Remenyi,B Wch U18 Girls 5th Guarapuava 1991 

12...Be6 13.Qc2 Bf5

Black should play 13...a5, neutralizing White's effort to create a weak point.

14.e4 Bg4 15.f3?!

Black to move

15...Be6=

15...Qb6+ 16.Kf1= (16.Kh1 Be6 17.a5 Qf2 18.Rf1 Qe2 19.Qd1 Qxd1 20.Rxd1 Rad8with a slight edge for Black)

16.Nf1

16.a5

16...h6

16...a5

17.a5 Rfd8 18.Be3

White to move

By this point, I was beginning to formulate a plan. When I played 12.a4, the intent was to provoke a weakness on the queenside. Now, the nature of that weakness is coming to light. Even so, this weakness offered me no advantage until my opponent's tactical error.

18...Kh7

18...b6 19.axb6 axb6=

19.Rxd8! Qxd8 20.Qf2 a6

I was optimistic that swapping the heavy pieces would leave Black with a vulnerable b-pawn that my king could threaten. However, if Black's king defends the pawn, it is not clear that I could make progress elsewhere.

20...b6 21.axb6 axb6 22.Rxa8 Qxa8 23.Bxb6 and White is slightly better; 
20...Bf8 21.Nd2=

21.Qe2?!

This move was rooted in shallow calculation and failure to understand the most important elements of the position

21.Nd2 would have been better with the idea of controlling c4.

21...Qe7 22.Bb6 Nd7|

Somehow I overlooked this move.

White to move

23.Be3 Rd8 24.Rd1 Nf8

I was happy for the opportunity to exchange the heavy pieces and continue with a minor piece struggle, thinking that I had some chances to exploit the hole on b6.

25.Rxd8 Qxd8 26.Bb6 Qd6

26...Qb8 27.b4=

27.Qd2 Qe7 28.Qd8

Forcing a minor piece ending (or is the resulting position still a middlegame?

28...Bf6 29.Qxe7

29.Qb8! Bg7 (29...Nd7 30.Qxb7) 30.b4 White may have a slight edge 30...Qd7 31.Bc5 Qc8 32.Qxc8 Bxc8 33.Kf2

29...Bxe7=

White to move

30.Ne3 Nd7 31.Ba7

31.Bc7 f6 32.b4 c5 33.Nd5 Bf8 34.Bf1

31...Bc5

31...Nc5 32.Nd1 Na4 33.Kf1

32.Bxc5 Nxc5 33.Bf1 f6

I expected 33...Nb3 when I tried to work out a line that could give me an advantage.

34...Bc8?!

34...Kg7; 
34...Bxc4 35.Nxc4=]

35.Kf2 White is playing for an advantage, but does not have much chance of winning.

35.b4 Ne6 36.Bxe6 Bxe6

35...Kg7 36.Ke2

36.b4 Na4 37.Nd1

36...Kf8 37.b4 Ne6 38.Ng4

38.Bxe6 might be best 38...Bxe6

38...Kg7 39.Kd3

39.Nf2!

39...Ng5 40.Ke3= 

Black to move
40...Nf7??

40...Bxg4 41.fxg4 Nf7 42.Bxf7 Kxf7 43.Kd3 Ke6 44.Kc4 Kd6 45.h4 h5 46.g5

Black to move
Analysis diagram

46...f5 (46...fxg5?? 47.hxg5 Kd7 48.Kc5 Kc7 49.c4 Kd7 50.Kb6 Kc8 51.b5 axb5 52.cxb5 cxb5 53.Kxb5 Kc7 54.Kc5+-) 47.Kd3 Ke6=

41.Bxf7+- h5

41...Kxf7 42.Nxh6+ Ke6 43.Ng4+-

42.Nxf6

42.Nxe5 fxe5 43.Be8! Bh3 44.f4+-; 
42.Bxg6 hxg4 43.Bh5 gxf3 44.Kxf3+-

42...Kxf7

42...Kxf6 43.Be8 (43.Bb3 was my intended move, but Be8 is better)

43.Nh7 Kg7 44.Ng5 Bd7 45.Kd3 Kf6 46.h4 Ke7 47.Kc4 Kd6 48.f4 exf4 49.gxf4 Bg4 50.Nf7+ Ke7 51.Ne5 Bh3 52.Nxg6+ Kd6 53.Kd4 Bc8 54.f5 Kc7 55.Kc5 Bd7 56.Nf4 Be8 57.e5 1-0

Once I had a clear advantage, I played as if I understood the game. But, my memory of this game lingers as several hours of confusion.

31 May 2026

Should have been easy

Late Thursday night during a thunderstorm, I played a few three minute games online. Two draws from dead lost positions became lessons in elementary endings to end the spring term for my before school elementary chess club.

In the first, my opponent ran desperately short of time in a bishop ending where he had an significant advantage in number of pawns. After promoting a pawn and using the queen to capture my last pawn, he had a forced checkmate in seven, but only 4.0 seconds left.

Black to move
50...Qe4+

My opponent opts for a sequence where premoves can be played to save time.

50...Qc7 leads to mate in six moves more.

51.Kd6 f4 52.Kc5 f3 53.Kd6 f2 54.Kc5 f1Q

A second queen appears and 3.0 seconds remain on the clock. It is also forced mate in three. Black has done well and should win.

There are two schools of thought on this position:
1) a decent player resigns in such a hopeless position, and
2) its is foolish to resign in a blitz game when your opponent has three seconds left.

55.Kd6

Black to move
What should a player know about checkmate with two queens?

From the hardest position against a lone king, it is mate in four. Checkmate can occur in the middle of the board. Checks are often the best move.

Most players, however, seem to think the ladder mate is simplest and therefore best. In this case, it can be accomplished with premoves.

55...Qff5

This move does not get closer to checkmate. That is, mate is still three moves in the future.

55...Qf6+ executes an easy ladder mate unless White opts for 56.Kc5 Qfc6#
I would probably play 55...Qa6 in a heartbeat.

56.Kc7 Qee6 57.Kd8

Black still has 2.8 seconds remaining and a simple mate in one.

57...Qff7??

The premove squandered half a point.

The second undeserved draw had gross errors by both players. Time was a less critical factor with both having more than half a minute on the clock.

White to move
58.Rh6??

I would play 58.Rb6

One of very few non-winning moves in this simple rook ending.

58...Rh1+ 59.Kg4 Rg1??

Black here is stuck in unimaginative routine moves that were wholly unnecessary when simply calculation shows that 59...Rxh6 draws easily.

60.Kf4 Rf1+

White to move
I started with this position with the young students, explaining that moving the king towards the rook puts an end to harassing checks. Ke4-d3-e2 (or f6+ if the rook gives up the checks).

61.Ke5 Re1+ 62.Kf4 Rf1+ 63.Kg4 Rg1+

At this point the game is technically drawn, as a repetition is about to occur. It is sad that a player rated in the mid-1900s does not know how to win this ending.

64.Kh5 Rh1+ 65.Kg4 Rg1+ drawn by repetition.

14 May 2026

Quest for Understanding

I have been trying to hold a draw against Stockfish from a position that Jan Timman failed to hold against Anatoly Karpov (Belfort 1988). The position was brought to my attention when I began rereading Jacob Aagaard, Excelling at Technical Chess (2004). Nearly twenty years ago, I read this book quickly and superficially, spending very little time with the instructive positions. I did read all the text and it had a profound impact on my game, particularly in my attitude towards offering or accepting draws when there is even a faint chance of battling for a win. In "Excelling at Technical Chess" (2011), I presented an annotated game where I prevailed in a minor piece battle, somewhat inspired by Aagaard's work.

Aagaard's annotations of the game elaborate the importance of activating your strongest piece. Timman does this well early in the endgame, but then seems to lose the thread and "play without a plan" (Aagaard 13).

White to move
Here, Aagaard writes, "everything has gone wrong for White", noting the passivity of White's rook compared to Black's active rook. However, according to Stockfish and tablebases, White's position remain a technical, however difficult, draw. A comment on chessgames.com credits Karsten Müller and Yakov Konoval, Understanding Rook Endgames (2016) with pointing out that the position is drawn.

Drawn according the computer is one thing, however, and holding such a position as a human is quite another. Aagaard points out in the next chapter of the book, "an advantage does not have to be decisive in order to win" (24). The defender must continue to find the best moves, while the side that is pressing for a win can try different things.

When Timman played his next move, 53.Ra3, the position was then technically lost. However, Karpov's technique was not without error. Five moves later, Timman again had chances to draw and missed the correct moves.

Likewise, playing 53.Ke3, 53.Rc4, or 53.Rd4 does not immediately secure the draw. Many subsequent positions offer a single move that must be found. Others offer two options, but no more. I played the position against Stockfish 18, needing help and takebacks at least half a dozen times to hold this position. Then I studied my efforts with the engine running, and practiced the ending again. After several efforts, I was able to hold the position against a weaker version of Stockfish on my iPad.

Alas, errors were made both by the weaker Stockfish and by me. So, more time was spent playing the latest Stockfish on a computer with the determination to reach such an understanding of the position that I can draw the machine with no errors.

One such exercise continued:

53.Rd4 h5 54.Ke3 h4 55.a4 Rf1 56.Rd8 Ra1

White's rook has become active, while Black's rook's mobility has been reduced.

White to move
I am beginning to understand that in this position (and likely similar ones) Black's rook must balance continuous checks with threats to capture the a-pawn should it be undefended. The king must get in front of the h-pawn.

57.Rd5+ Kg4 58.Kf2 Rxa4 59.Kg2

Each of White's last three moves were the only move to maintain a draw.

59...Ra2+ 60.Kh1 Kg3 61.Rd3+

The side check is the only chance.

61...Kf2

White to move
62.Rd5

This move both restrains the mobility of Black's rook with a threat on the pawn and prepares checks from the rear.

62...Ke3 63.Rc5

63.Re5+ Kd4 64.Rf5 also holds.

63...Kd4 64.Rf5 h3 65.Rb5 h2

White to move
66.Rb5+

The next 50 moves were efforts to get the engine to capture my rook for stalemate.

A Longer Battle

Starting from the initial position at the top of the post with a different move still led to a position in the line above.

53.Ke3 h5 54.Rd4 h4 55.a4 Rf1 56.Rd8

56.Rd7 also holds

56...Ra1 57.Rd5+ Kg4 58.Kf2 Rxa4 59.Kg2

Black to move
59...h3+

59...Ra2+ was played in the line above.

60.Kh2 Ra1

White to move
In this position, White has two viable moves, but for most of the next thirty or so, only one move holds.

61.Rd4+

61.Rc5 was the other option. Would it make subsequent moves simpler?

61...Kf3 62.Rd5

A check allows the king to attack the rook, so cannot be played. After 62.Rd3+ Ke4, White's rook can neither check the king nor attack the a-pawn. Hence, Black's rook becomes more active and the a-pawn becomes a credible queening threat.

At least, that has been my understanding. However, if Black attacks the rook with 62...Ke2, White is lost nonetheless. 63.Rd5 attacks the pawn 63...a4 is now the only winning move. 64.Rd4 a3. Again, Black had to push the pawn to maintain the win. After 65.Ra4 Kd2 66.Rf4, White appears close to setting up Vancura's defense, but 66...Rc1 refutes White's plan (Black also might slide the king back to the e-file temporarily). 67.Ra4 Rc3 Both of Black's pawns are secure and the king is free to move to b2 where all possible checks can be blocked.

62...a4 63.Rd4


Why does 63.Rc5 fail? 63...Re1 64.Ra5 Re4 65.Kxh3 Ke2 and Black's king will reach b2 while his rook is also more active.

63...Ra2+ 64.Kh1

64.Kxh3 was possible here, but not in many other positions that I reached during my training exercises.

64...Kg3 65.Rd3+

Of course, the mate threat must be stopped.

65...Kh4 66.Rd4+

66.Rc3?? The loss of a single tempo allows Black to reposition the rook with a winning advantage. 66...Rb2 (or Rd2 etc.) 67.Ra3 Rb4. An instructive line continues 68.Kh2 Kg4 69.Rg3+ Kf4 70.Rxh3 Rb2+ 71.Kg1

Black to move
Analysis diagram
71...Rb3 is the only winning move, but it is not difficult to find.

66...Kd3 67.Rd3+ Kf2 68.Rd4

Again, White must eye the a-pawn.

68...Ra1+ 69.Kh2 Ke3


White to move
70.Rc4

A rare instance when White has four viable options, all along the fourth rank.

After dodging many checks, Black advanced the pawn to a3 on move 78. White continued the checks from the side without difficulty as the position is essentially the same as found in the Vancura defense.

Then, 90...Ke4 offered White some choices.

White to move
Again, any move along the third rank that does not hang the rook holds the draw.

91.Rc3 Kd4 92.Rf3 Kc5 93.Rf5+

This check was unnecessary with Black's king temporarily on holiday.

93...Kb4 94.Rf4+

This check, however, was the only move.

94...Kc5 95.Rf5+ Kd6 96.Rf3

Either check from f6 or return to the third rank.

Both players shuffled their pieces for many moves until Black set a tactical trap: a discovery that wins a critical tempo.

White to move
After 120...Ra1
121.Kh2

121.Rf3 Kb2-+

After another two dozen moves:

Black to move
After 145.Kh2
145...a2

This move was what White had been anticipating, for now the ending has become a simple one that I have played many times.

146.Ra3 with an easy draw, but the engine took it out to move 195 when the game was drawn by the 50-move rule.

Has this exercise increased my knowledge in a way that might be applicable to new positions? The central theme of this ending, as analyzed by Aagaard, and as played out against the computer in the effort to improve on Timman's play, is the mobility of the strongest piece--the rook.



20 April 2026

Sacrificial B-file Attacks

The best game of Chess Informant 166 republished in CI 167 offers this diagram, where White won with an instructive final assault. The game is Esipenko,A. -- Abasov, N., Goa 2025. Elements of the combination remind me of two nineteenth century games: Bird,H. -- Morphy,P., London 1858; and Rosanes,J. -- Anderssen, A., Breslau 1862.

White to move
19.b5! c5

The bishop is safe in view of 19...bxa6 20.bxc6

20.b6!

Some of my students found 19.b5, but not 20.b6.

20...bxa6 21.bxa7 Qxa7 22.Qc6+ Bc7 23.Qe6+ Rd7 24.dxc5 Qxc5 

White to move
25.Qxa6+ Kd8 26.Qa8+

Black resigned.

Bird also resigned when he lost an undeveloped rook.

Black to move
17...Rxf2 18.Bxf2 Qa3 19.c6

The attack along the short diagonal and the necessary push of the c-pawn was the first similarity I noticed between this Morphy game and Esipenko's attack.

19...Qxa2 20.b4 Qa1+ 21.Kc2 Qa4+

White to move
22.Kb2?

22.Kc1 leaves Black with a clear advantage, but White can play on. For instance, 22...a5 23.Rhg1 and Black must defend before continuing the attack.

22...Bxb4! 23.cxb4 Rxb4+ 24.Qxb4

Else mate come fast.

24...Qxb4 25.Kc2 e3 26.Bxe3 Bf5+ 27.Rd3 28.Kd2

Black to move
28...Qa2+ 29.Kd1

29.Ke1 Bxd3 and capturing the bishop surrenders the other rook, too.

29...Qb1+ and the undeveloped rook falls.

Rosanes -- Anderssen is simpler.

Black to move
16...Red8

At his best, Anderssen brought his rooks into play with great effect.

17.Nf3?

White remains worse in all lines, but this move offers Anderssen a forced mate in five.

17...Qxb3+ 18.axb3 Rxb3 19.Be1

19.Qd3 delays mate a move longer.

19...Be3+ 20.Qxe3 Rb1#



15 April 2026

Mood Swings

Yesterday afternoon, I threw away an easy draw against a player rated 400 lower. How I found myself playing for a draw is another matter. A bit later, a player rated 200 higher than me threw away an easy win.

White to move
81.Ra3+??

81.Kxe5 and Black's winning chances are gone.

81...Kd4? 

Black returns the favor.

82.Ra4+ Ke3 83.Ra3+ Rd3

Now Black is winning and had no difficulty converting what remained of the ending.

It was a painful loss.

Then, early for a chess lesson with some young students, I sat in my truck in the parking lot and played a game on my phone. The opening went poorly after I played the French Defense in an unusual manner.

Black to move
16...Bxa2?

1...O-O was better, but I remain down a pawn.

17.Ne5

White's plans are clear.

17...O-O

17...Rc8 at least shows recognition of White's threats.

18.Rd7?? Ne5!-+

Now I am winning. The next ten minutes sitting in my truck moving chess pieces on my phone brought pleasure as I ground out a win.


26 February 2026

Neither Winning, Nor Losing

My young students this week are seeing this position from an online game played a couple of days ago.

White to move
White has many ways to win this game with overwhelming material superiority, but Black's last move, 40...Rf8, presents White with a problem. A student's immediate suggestion of 41.Nf7+ is good enough to move towards checkmate. 41.Ng4 or 41.Rf7 leads to a shorter forced checkmate sequence.

In the game, White played 41.d6?? oblivious to the purpose behind Black's last move. The game was soon drawn by repetition: 41...Rf1+ 42.Kg2 Rf2+ 43.Kg3 Rf3+ 44.Kg2 Rf2+ 45.Kh3 Rf3+ 46.Kg4 Rf4+ 47.Kg3 Rf3+ 48.Kg2 Rf2+

Taking the rook at any point leaves Black in stalemate.

The second position arose in the Spokane Chess Club's Fall Championship 20 years ago. 

White to move
Again, White has an overwhelming advantage. The simple 54.Rc6 would end things quickly.

My opponent played 54.h7??

After 54...Rxb7 55.Rd6 Rg7+ 56.Kh6 Rxh7+ 57.Kg6 Rg7+ we agreed to a draw.


20 February 2026

Zugzwang

Black is busted, as only pawns can move.

White to move
One winning idea would be to march the king to b7 or d6. Black can do nothing to prevent this. Even pushing the majority is rooted in illusion.

For instance, 38.Kf2 g5 39.Ke3 f5 40.Kd3 f4 41.Kc4 g4 42.Kc5 f3 43.gxf3 gxf3 44.Kd6

Black to move
44...f2 45.Rb1 Nb5+ 46.Ke5

Black can capture the passed a-pawn, giving up the knight. White's extra piece would still prevail.

Inexplicably, White played 38.Ne7?? After 38...Ke7 39.Rxe8+ Kxe8, Black was in complete control.