Correspondence Chess
Research is a central pleasure of correspondence chess. Using opening books, databases, and both print and electronic versions of
Chess Informant elevates my play in the short run and expands my over the board repertoire in the long run.
As I was finishing high school and starting college, I played in a US Chess Federation Correspondence tournament in which moves were sent via postcard. My only opening book in those days was I. A. Horowitz,
Chess Openings: Theory and Practice (1964). After finishing graduate school, I entered a few more USCF postal events. I bought the A volume of
Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (ECO) and tried to steer my games to lines that were found therein. I also bought
Informant 64. One of the games in that issue was especially helpful in a game against Faneuil Adams, Jr. (see "
Playing by the Book").
In the early 2000s, I made the switch from postcard to email for correspondence chess. Then, in 2003, I started playing on websites where move transmission was a matter of clicking and dragging a chess piece on a computer screen. Record keeping is handled by the website. Move transmission in this new form of correspondence chess differs enough from postcards and email, that many players no longer think of it as correspondence chess.
I learned a lot playing in a Spanish Opening thematic on the first of these websites that I joined. I scored a nice victory on the Black side of the Chigorin variation and also made my first efforts with the Marshall Attack.
By the time I was playing turn-based chess, as some call this online correspondence chess, I had all five volumes of ECO and a library near 200 volumes, including many specialized texts on my favorite openings. Now I have ECO in both print and electronic editions, and I have all 123
Chess Informants in electronic versions (
Informant 124 comes out next week--I've ordered book and CD).
The Study Regimen
Sitting at the table with a chess board and opening monograph and systematically working through the lines may be a worthwhile study technique. I am certain that is how many players learn their openings. That is also what I did in the late 1970s with Horowitz when I was supposed to be working on my high school homework. But, for me, such study is a rare activity.
My book study more often consists of working through entire games, such as those by Paul Morphy, or middle game books, or
Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual, a book that I have as both print and Kindle (see
Pawn Endings Flash Cards).
On the other hand, all of my opening resources come out during some of my correspondence games. Last week when I logged into
ChessWorld.net, I discovered that a new team match had begun, adding eight new games to my load. It is time to hit the books.
Against one opponent, I am trying a new line against the Tarrasch French that is recommended in both
The Flexible French (2008) by Viktor Moskalenko, and
The Modern French (2012) by Dejan Antic and Branimir Maksimovic. Using my ChessBase database, I located games in this line played by Moskalenko and by Antic. I am studying these games.
Against another opponent, I opted to play the King's Gambit. I have been deploying the King's Gambit in many of my blitz and bullet games the past few weeks. I also played in in one of my worst tournament games ever (see "
Knowing Better"). The King's Gambit has been an occasional weapon for me off and on since the 1970s. Because one of my top students plays it, I am studying it again. I watched Simon Williams' King's Gambit video series on
Chess.com. John Shaw,
The King's Gambit (2013) arrives tomorrow.
As I play through my correspondence games, I study the relevant portions of the opening lines in these books and others. I look up the positions in
Chess Informant and examine some of the games. During one recent correspondence game, I went through every one of the more than one hundred games ever published in
Informant that had reached the position I had at that moment. That work took the better part of a weekend. The game might have ended as a draw, but my opponent was banned for cheating and I won on time.
Sometimes I use
Chess.com's Game Explorer or ChessBase to play the percentages, choosing lines that have scored well in the past for my side of the board. When I have the time, I look for lines that score well for my opponent, but that have a recent refutation in
Informant or some other collection of annotated games. Knowing that many of my opponents use the same databases that I do, I try to beat them with better research.